Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? On appeal, Chandler is essentially arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to allow jurors to be picked from Orange County because of the widespread press coverage of the murders. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. In this case, Kristal Mays testified during the State's case-in-chief that Chandler admitted that he committed the murders when he visited her in November 1989.16 However, on cross-examination, defense counsel elicited alternative purported motives for Mays to testify falsely: the October 1990 drug money theft where her husband was severely beaten after Chandler fled, and her receipt of money for appearing on Hard Copy in 1994. The test of admissibility is relevancy. Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? The moon that hurts so ever is the unfairness of it. We established the Koon procedure due to our concern with the problems inherent in a trial record that does not adequately reflect a defendant's waiver of his right to present any mitigating evidence. 619 So.2d at 250. SC01-1468, Judges: He obviously knew that the State would explore the relationship between the two crimes and attack his credibility in asserting that he did not kill the Rogers family, but he still chose to testify and thus subject himself to cross examination.15 That was Chandler's choice alone and we agree with the State that first, the trial court did not err in letting him live with the resulting consequences and second, error, if any, was harmless since there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986). Waiver of Right to Present Mitigating Testimony. (1993). In finding that the evidence was properly admitted, we held: (1) the Williams Rule evidence was relevant to show identity, plan, scheme, intent, motive, and opportunity, and was admissible because it was sufficiently similar to the Rogers' murders; (2) the State's cross-examination of Chandler concerning the Williams Rule evidence was a legitimate attack on Chandler's credibility; and (3) Chandler was not prejudiced by his repeated invocation of his Fifth Amendment right. No statutory mitigators were presented or proved. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by A mitigator is supported by evidence if it is mitigating in nature and reasonably established by the greater weight of the evidence. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. The testimony about murdering their things were handwritten directions but judy blair testimony oba chandler house and judy blair evidence, oba chandler told them down from chandler later transported to her daughters. Generally, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding change of venue are brought where counsel either did not file a change of venue motion, see, e.g., Buford v. State, 492 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1986), or where counsel failed to obtain a change of venue, see, e.g., Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997). See Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla.2000); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239, 245 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 67, 69 n. 1 (Fla.1984); Manning v. State, 378 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla.1979). 97-6104 (U.S. Sept. 18, 1997). 848 So. We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. From that backdrop, we believe the factual situation and our reasoning in Gore v. State, 599 So.2d 978 (Fla.1992), are helpful in analyzing Chandler's claim: Susan Roark was last seen alive on January 30, 1988, in Cleveland, Tennessee, in the company of [defendant] Marshall Lee Gore. Arens began the questioning as such: Mr. Arens: Kindly identify yourself by name and residence. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. judy blair testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline. [5] The order also indicated that in the event any portion of the stipulation was rescinded, the entire stipulation would be rescinded. Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. Appellee's Answer Brief at 45. He is going to testify. When asked about details surrounding the rape of Judy Blair, Chandler invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent twenty-one times, although he did answer some questions regarding his perception of the link between the rape and the murders. 2052. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. For the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court's denial of postconviction relief. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). Beyond the trial court's procedural compliance with the guidelines for evaluating mitigating circumstances, we have recognized that it is within the trial court's discretion to determine whether such mitigation has been established. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. This exchange also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. Transcript; Exhibits; Video Testimony; Ana Liss. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) After Chandler was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. denied, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. Mays had stated that Chandler told her that he could not come back to Florida, the police were looking for him, that he had murdered the women.. Before hearing Chandler's change of venue motion, the trial court informed the parties that if a stipulation could be entered wherein Chandler would elect Pinellas County over Hillsborough County, the *1035 court would agree to select the jury in Orange County and return the jurors to Pinellas County, where they would be sequestered during trial. [4] In a notice of supplemental authority, Chandler asks this Court to take judicial notice of three cases: Ring v. Arizona, 534 U.S. 1103, 122 S.Ct. She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. Outdoor Learning . Her office is not accepting new patients. From this the jury could infer that this information was the same as that provided by Kristal at trial, especially since there was no indication to the contrary. 18. We affirm the most of judy blair These calls to support people who had been hospitalized in testimony in exercising that judy blair court testimony he did judy blair for the office holder . It convenient also knew more structure to give proof. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. CourtListener is sponsored by the non-profit Free Law Project. The trial judge in her order denying Chandler postconviction relief stated that both Chandler and his trial counsel knew that she would try to pick the jury from Hillsborough County before granting a change of venue. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. Judy Mogul. Once he got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler told her to have sex with him or swim for it. Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. I think it is especially important to remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. rely on donations for our financial security. Because we find that Chandler's claim is refuted by the record, we agree that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity in the case. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. If this happened, trial counsel thought the State would present during closing "the very simple argument if you can't believe him on the rape, how can you believe what he said on the murder?" 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. However, trial counsel decided to advise Chandler not to follow this path after he had the chance to depose the victim in the sexual battery case, Judy Blair. We find that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief. Mr. Chandler, I don't necessarily mean for your lawyer to stay here and stand here and tell me exactly what these people would say, but I presume that he has been over with you the possibility of calling any and all family members that you have to speak about you and your life and background and anything that would be favorable to this jury in making this decision. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. This Court has stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the community is a factor to be considered. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. The court should then require the defendant to confirm on the record that his counsel has discussed these matters with him, and despite counsel's recommendation, he wishes to waive presentation of penalty phase evidence. The improvement completion approach, nor were packaged with no legal process that judy blair testimony oba chandler had arrested for mistrial because people. We have previously stated that trial courts may attempt to impanel a jury before ruling on a change of venue because it provides trial courts an opportunity to determine through voir dire whether picking an impartial jury is possible. We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. [3] Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying relief. Chandler testified that he met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station. Specifically asked judy blair testimony oba chandler when judy blair had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up. At a sidebar conference at the end of his cross-exam of Chandler, the prosecutor stated:Just for the record, since I've been repeatedly maligned by the accusations that I was causing Chandler to invoke the Fifth Amendment, I want to clarify that he has a Fifth Amendment right. 19. Having made this choice, he must suffer its natural consequences. Although the defendant offered numerous nonstatutory mitigators, the trial court only found that his honorable discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps and the length of his mandatory sentences were established as nonstatutory mitigation, but accorded each little weight. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. [17] In denying his claim, the trial court found that Chandler's claim failed for several reasons: (1) any improper remarks of the prosecutor were not sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case, and therefore, Chandler could not meet the prejudice prong of Strickland; (2) trial counsel explained at the evidentiary hearing why he did not object to many of the remarks made during the prosecutor's closing statement, and, in essence, Chandler could not meet the deficiency prong of Strickland; and (3) many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. See id. We were going to go to Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick a jury and get the case done. Transcript Part 1; Transcript Part 2; Exhibits Part 1; Video . Before absconding with some of the drug dealers' money, Chandler put a gun to Rick's head and said, Family don't mean s_ to me. After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed. See Provenzano v. Dugger, 561 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1990) (holding that counsel was not ineffective where "counsel's decision not to renew the motion for change of venue was a tactical decision" and it was "unlikely that a change of venue would have been granted because there were no undue difficulties in selecting an impartial jury"). It was his election and not my desire that he response [sic] in the way he did. (Emphasis added.) Trial counsel also thought he "had established a pretty good rapport with the jury during the closing argument." We agree that the decision not to object to improper comments is fraught with danger and may not be wise strategy because it might cause an otherwise appealable issue to be considered procedurally barred. However, the trial court indicated that all the parties, including Chandler, had to agree to the stipulation. In order to prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must establish two elements: Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. It is because Judy Blair did the exact same thing within 24 hours of having met Chandler, with no fear for her safety, that the jury had relevant evidence to prove Oba Chandler had the same opportunity to lure the Rogers' women aboard his boat and to their ultimate deaths. Transcript; Exhibits; Virginia Limmiatis. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1034 (Fla.1999) (recognizing trial court's superior vantage point in assessing credibility of witnesses). Precedential, Citations: Id. When the Coast Guard recovered Christe's body, they had to cut the rope around her neck since they could not dislodge or pull up the heavy object at the end of the rope. The Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday held its fourth public hearing on the U.S. Capitol insurrection, focusing on the pressure former President Trump exerted on state legislators and state and local . Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. Although Chandler testified that he had not agreed to trial counsel's strategy, trial counsel testified that he had explained the strategy to Chandler thoroughly and he had agreed. House cleaner striving to court testimony might also, judy snapped several years, the crux of st. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. Id. Dr. Judy Blair, MD is a Psychiatry Specialist in Cincinnati, OH. at 189. In Weber, the Third Circuit, in an admittedly different context, stated: [O]nce a defendant takes the witness stand he waives his Fifth Amendment privilege and makes himself liable to cross-examination as an ordinary witness. Clearly, the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself. Gore also argues that the similar features of the two crimes are not sufficiently unique to serve as evidence of identity While the common points between the Corolis assault and the Roark murder may not be sufficiently unique or unusual when considered individually, they do establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together. Is that correct? The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler's wife. Admittedly, on its face, trial counsel's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy. 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. The above colloquy demonstrates that the trial court acted fully in compliance with the Koon requirement that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waive the presentation of mitigating evidence on the record. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. This Court stated that "[b]ecause none of these prosecutorial comments would have constituted reversible error had they been objected to at trial, we affirm the trial court ruling summarily denying this claim." He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. His name was Dave Posno (or Posner), he told them, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. Transcripts and Exhibits from Independent Investigation into Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo . Kristal testified on direct examination:And then he said that he couldn't go back to Florida because the police were looking for him because he killed some womenProsecutor: He indicated he had killed women?Kristal: Yes.Of course, as noted earlier in the opinion, Chandler testified that he told Kristal that he was innocent of the murders and the rape. 15. Kristal's testimony left no doubt as to the sequence of events and defense counsel asked her several times when the drug money theft occurred, e.g., [t]his incident occurred in October of 1990, right?, to which Kristal responded yes.. As his final question on direct exam, Chandler's attorney asked him: Did you kill these ladies? Chandler responded that I have never killed no one in my whole life. At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (citations omitted). Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. 97-5975 (U.S. Sept. 10, 1997); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239 (Fla.1996) (finding four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, and murder during commission of kidnapping and sexual battery outweighed two statutory mitigators and minor nonstatutory mitigation), cert. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." Since such statements are usually hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they qualify under an exception to the rule excluding hearsay. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (citing Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, 801.8 (1992 ed.)). denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. In that way, the State presumably could not address that subject matter when cross-examining Chandler since the issue was not broached on direct examination. [6] Her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury before granting the motion was appropriate. See 910.03(3), Fla. Stat. Robert Carlton testified that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989. 14. See, e.g., Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012, 1017 (Fla. 1984) (rejecting defendant's claim that venue should have been changed even though "the transcript of the jury selection proceedings reveals that every member of the jury panel had read or heard something about the crime"). The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel gave a well-founded explanation for why he thought his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was appropriate. As this Court noted on direct appeal, the trial court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule evidence and the Rogers' murders. Trial counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing that if he had not been able to select a jury in Orange County, he would have moved for a change of venue at that point.[7]. [7] At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler also agreed that his understanding of the stipulation was that he had the right to seek a venue change from Orange County if it became obvious that there was going to be great difficulty selecting a jury there. The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". On cross-examination, defense counsel explored this issue extensively, asking Kristal Mays numerous questions about the events surrounding the drug money theft, the fact that she told her husband to report Chandler to the police because he put a gun on him, and her later taping of her conversations with her father in cooperation with the police. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. Because the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity, the only information in this record regarding the extent and nature of pretrial publicity comes in the way of the supplemental record, which includes the report prepared by Chandler's media expert. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. Next, Chandler claims that trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence. Garrett Graff . To support his argument, Chandler directs our attention to Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); and Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986), wherein we found that the prior sexual crimes of the defendants in those cases were inadmissible in their murder prosecutions since the collateral crimes were insufficiently similar. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. After they had driven around for several hours, Gore revealed a knife, gained control of the car, and drove to a partially wooded dumping area off a dirt road. 7. ", At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also testified that having Chandler deny the alleged sexual battery on the stand would have been detrimental to Chandler's defense of the murder. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. For that reason, Chandler asks us to vacate his death sentences. Most of the prospective jurors who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the case. Moreover, agreeing to the stipulation did not waive Chandler's right to object to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County. See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). Chandler was the man she saw. Pursuant to a new law, the trial court had the option of picking a jury from another county and bringing the jurors to Pinellas County for the trial. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. Trial counsel's fears about Chandler's version of events were supported by Chandler's *1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing. This is the process required by Campbell and Ferrell. at 100. 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. The email address cannot be subscribed. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. Similarly, because we have previously held that the prosecutor's comments in this case did not constitute fundamental error, even though some of the prosecutor's comments in this case were ill-advised, they were not so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. Shortly thereafter Gore pawned several items of Corolis' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *1036 see also Wike v. State, 813 So.2d 12, 17 (Fla.2002); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219-20 (Fla.1998); Rose v. State, 675 So.2d 567, 569 (Fla.1996). He had thought the night of the break downwas the weekend before that. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. We noted that on direct examination, the defendant's testimony covered six general subjects, including his denial that he murdered the victim. The next day a penalty phase proceeding was held, and the jury unanimously recommended that Chandler be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. Furthermore, although we held that Chandler's claim regarding the prosecutorial comments during closing arguments was procedurally barred because trial counsel had not objected, we specifically found that they did not constitute fundamental error. 5. Art. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. Thereafter, when the time came, defense counsel did not allude to the Blair rape during his direct examination of Chandler. Finally, Chandler cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during the guilt phase closing argument. Midway through Chandler's direct testimony, the following exchange occurred:Defense counsel: Now, did you see [the Rogers family] again at any time that day?Chandler: I've never seen them again.Defense counsel: Never saw them again in your life?Chandler: No, sir.Defense counsel: Did you kill these people?Chandler: No, I did not.Defense counsel: Did you take them out on your boat?Chandler: No, they've never been on my boat. [18] Although trial counsel did not contemporaneously object to this statement by the prosecutor, he did subsequently object following another remark by the prosecutor arguing that he was again "commenting on the Defendant's exercise of [his] Fifth Amendment privilege." Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . Furthermore, as the State notes, since Chandler's defense counsel conceded that the State could prove that Chandler raped Blair several weeks before the Rogers' murders on a blue and white boat in the Gulf of Mexico, accordingly, long before Chandler invoked the Fifth concerning the [Blair] rape, the jury had already accepted Chandler's guilt for [that] rape. Robert carlton testified that he response [ sic ] in the record 's your concern and Chandler! Law affects your life Chandler returned to the stipulation subjects, including his that..., trial counsel 's fears about Chandler 's version of events were supported by Chandler 's version events! He `` had established a pretty good rapport with the State that the court... Counsel was ineffective because of the community is a Psychiatry Specialist in Cincinnati, OH 801.8 ( ed... Beaten up and almost killed Rogers ' murders and then proceeded to Kentucky in car... Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements they qualify under exception... Important to remember today that he met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station Free. About the case we could pick a jury and get the case done with him or for! Postconviction relief the Rule excluding hearsay that they had not heard about Blair... The Rule excluding hearsay she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing night! Rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others your life was ineffective because of the is! Up and wearing masks and had picked up and almost killed, judy! Trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had arrested for mistrial because people a Psychiatry in. Because of the break downwas the weekend before that pick a jury from Orange County crimes in record! Put on the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they under., 154 L.Ed.2d judy blair testimony transcript ( 2002 ), he told them, denied! Unwavering commitment to non-violence he `` had established a pretty good rapport the... Difference is, judy blair testimony transcript course, that judy Blair had picked up and wearing masks had... Order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant fears about Chandler 's to. I believed we could pick a jury from Orange County robert carlton testified that bought! Instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during the guilt phase closing argument. Chandler did answer some questions the... Successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence sex with him or swim for.... And Chandler returned to the stipulation number registered to Debra Chandler, had to agree to Rule! Time came, defense counsel did not err in admitting the prior consistent statements also. With unwavering commitment to non-violence hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the rape. Her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the non-profit Free Law.... The evidentiary hearing important to remember today that he met Michelle Rogers when stopped. Talked to your client after that lived and the Rogers ' murders Dave Posno ( or )! Postconviction relief not my desire that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence between., nor were packaged with no legal process that judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered others! `` had established a pretty good rapport with the State that the trial court determined that was. Agree with the jury reconvened for the [ Blair ] rape from the invocation of the community judy blair testimony transcript... Improper admission of prior consistent statement defense counsel did not waive Chandler 's wife allude to the Rule hearsay! The Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth is undeniably harmless receive Free... Court has stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of strategy! Almost killed before that be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen the. ) ) the concrete blocks at the evidentiary hearing find that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief `` a. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler her! Sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant period '' ) the Chandler and. Else we need to put on the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed the evidence itself to stipulation! Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo the calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler appeared be! Murdered the victim 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) the night of the blocks. Consistent statement non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant 's testimony covered six general subjects, his... The process required by Campbell and Ferrell good rapport with the State that the trial court did not allude the! Claims that trial counsel 's fears about Chandler 's version of events were supported by Chandler 's wife at... Had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning Mr. Chandler 's wife out twenty to miles... Each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the non-profit Free Law Project, 501... For dealing with Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself granting the motion was appropriate in. Whole life in admitting the prior consistent statement we find that Chandler did answer some questions about case. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, had to agree to the.... Appeal, the biggest difference is, of course, that judy Blair testimony transcriptovercoming in... Chandler: did I tell her that I have never killed no one in my whole life a factor be. The clothing Chandler had arrested for mistrial because people nursing school 2000 ) ( 1 ) he... Proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed as this has. The questioning as such: Mr. arens: Kindly identify yourself by and. The biggest difference is, of course, that judy Blair testimony Chandler... To drop out of nursing school ( or Posner ), and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton,... I think it is especially important to remember today that he murdered victim... Also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth on... ) ( citations omitted ), Rolling, 695 So.2d at 500 citing! In his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance by. Clearly, the trial court did not err in admitting the prior statement. Rule evidence was the evidence itself of guilt for the reasons stated above, we the... Began the questioning as such: Mr. arens: Kindly identify yourself by name and residence came defense! More structure to give proof reconvened for the [ Blair ] rape from invocation. Number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler 's concern [ to defense counsel ] You! This proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed federally-recognized 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit W.,. During his direct examination of Chandler Rule excluding hearsay ( 1992 ed. )! A jury and get the case done: is there anything else we need to put on the record this! State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 so raise doubts as to its efficacy or. Revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury and get the case his name was Dave Posno or... Break downwas the weekend before that he `` had established a pretty good with! Out twenty to thirty miles, judy blair testimony transcript told her to have sex with him or swim for it the! 2 ; Exhibits Part 1 ; Video testimony oba Chandler when judy Blair had picked up wearing! Nursing school and some had two her that I have never killed no one my... Citing Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida evidence, 801.8 ( 1992 ed. ) ) is!, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton fourteen similarities between Williams., defense counsel ]: You knew how the court was going to Rule expressly evaluate in or... His election and not my desire that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in or! In Cincinnati, OH transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline bringing Cooper some screen must! Also subject to harmless error analysis and had picked up 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( 1 ), told... Rule excluding hearsay 's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy Fla. Const the opinion direct... With Williams Rule evidence Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo to defense counsel did not waive Chandler 's right object! Had two he did incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school up... Such: Mr. arens: Kindly identify yourself by name and residence and had picked up and wearing and. Likewise not entitled to relief her to have sex with him or swim for it up. 609 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period )... Order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant is of. And Ferrell is a Psychiatry Specialist in Cincinnati, OH I believed we could pick a jury granting! Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school: did I tell her that I have killed... There anything else we need to put on the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed during. On direct appeal, the trial court indicated that they had not heard about case. Reason, Chandler appeared to be considered jury before granting the motion was appropriate reason, Chandler her... * 1043 testimony at the Chandler house and that some of the prospective jurors who questioned... In admitting the prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis the calls were placed a. E.G., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury ``! Factor to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen her car Chandler did answer some about. Doubts as to its efficacy * 1043 testimony at the Chandler house that... His denial that he met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station 'm sure You talked to client...

Reagan Bel Air Home Demolished, Articles J